The global fishing industry is a classic complex system. The supply chain includes everyone from international corporations to individual fishermen at sea for months or years. Changing how fishing works is one of the most challenging campaigns out there. Here’s what we can learn from the recent work to reform Thai Union.
Global fishing sustainability has been in a precarious position for decades. Commercial fishing is a complex worldwide industry with hard to trace supply chains and nearly invisible players far out to sea. Despite devastating ecosystems worldwide, it’s long been a challenge for Greenpeace and other conservation advocates to expose and shift how the system works.
Thai Union is one of the largest seafood companies in the world. Its supply chain connects global fishing markets, ports, and customers. But Thai Union has a tiny public profile and is virtually unheard of amongst global consumers.
In 2014, Greenpeace organisers chose to put a broader, more human lens on their fisheries campaign. They partnered with human rights and labor organizations. Moving companies like Thai Union needed a coalition of voices (and skills) with a unified message.
“Connecting the plight of fishermen and processing workers in the supply chain with environmental standards and protecting our natural resources was really a master stroke [that] allowed us to appeal to many more organisations, consumers, brands and other important players,” said Jon Hartough, Thailand project lead and global campaigns consultant for the International Transport Workers’ Federation. “If we were focusing on the labor angle, or just the environmental piece, it wouldn’t have worked the same way.”
The shift, and partners, played a key role in what was ultimately a successful campaign to get Thai Union to publicly adopt sustainability and labor standards.
Global labor partnership expands audience and message
The campaign’s origins included research, relationship building, and behind the scenes discussions. Thai Union was chosen as a target due to its strategic importance, and the pressure it was already facing due to profile-raising exposés, including Ian Urbina’s award winning 2015 New York Times story “Sea Slaves: The Human Misery that Feeds Pets and Livestock.”
Greenpeace had been a member of the Thai Seafood Working Group since 2013. Greenpeace presented its campaign to the Working Group, a coalition of about 60 different human rights and labor organizations started by the International Labor Relations Forum (ILRF), before going public with it.
“Our approach was one of listening,” said David Pinsky, Senior Oceans Campaigner with Greenpeace USA. “How can Greenpeace, given its presence in multiple countries…be an asset and ensure that workers voices are part of this campaign?”
Greenpeace, labor unions and others soon learned that they all had been working on various fisheries labor, human rights, and environmental issues. Each had information valuable to new partners. For example, Greenpeace had long been using its ships to document illegal fishing. Crews often found evidence of labor abuses.
“The Esperanza did an Indian Ocean ship tour that tried to identify the impacts of illegal fishing,” said Pinsky. “When we saw conditions of labor violations, we documented it and gave it to partners and relevant authorities.”
Partners also learned that similar economic and supply chain issues were driving both overfishing and labor exploitation.
“The more we spoke with environmental groups about what they know about how fishing industries work, the clearer it became that the same reckless profit motives and diminishing margins resulting in overfishing are also causing labor exploitation,” said Abby McGill, director of campaigns at ILRF. “The worse the environmental side gets, the worse that the labor side gets.”
Secondary targets have powerful, pet-loving customers
Of course, just having a stronger message was not enough. Thai Union had little name recognition among global consumers. This meant Greenpeace would need to get creative with targets and how it engaged the public and decision makers.
In the U.S., campaigners focused on Thai Union’s better-known subsidiary, Chicken of the Sea.
Campaigners also found new voices on digital platforms. Pet food makers are big Thai Union customers. Greenpeace enlisted the support of YouTube pet celebrities to make the campaign relevant in places like New Zealand, where there are no Thai Union brands. Celebrities engaged their followers to pressure Mars Petcare and Nestle Purina to stand up against overfishing and labor exploitation in their supply chains.
“That reached a new audience, and led to commitments from both Nestle and Mars to address problematic transhipment [offloading product to other boats–allowing a fishing boat to continue fishing, sometimes for months or years at a time] in their supply chains,” said Pinsky.
Earlier this year, Thai Union agreed to a code of conduct for vessels in its supply chain. The next step includes monitoring to ensure the agreement is adhered to and that it has a positive impact both for oceans and workers across Thai Union’s supply chain.
“We don’t think labor provisions in the agreement will solve all potential illegal worker exploitation in Thai Union’s supply chain, but [they are] certainly the highest standards to date of any seafood agreement,” said McGill. “We are going to be discussion with Greenpeace, Thai Union, worker and union partners about how these things can be implemented.”
The campaign demonstrates the power of broad coalitions that connect historically disparate issues (the environmental and labor practices of fishing companies) with a common cause. For Greenpeace, it’s also clear that the decision to look at fisheries from a different perspective earlier this decade was the right one.
“I’m proud of our focus on workers rights in the Thai Union campaign,” said Pinsky. “First and foremost it had a focus on justice…it can help reach more audiences, but the guiding force for us was that it is the just thing to do.”